Should Homosexuals be allowed to Adopt?

This controversial issue has once again been brought to the forefront of public consciousness with the news that Vice President Dick Cheney’s openly lesbian daughter, Mary Cheney, is pregnant and plans to raise the child with her partner of 15 years, Heather Poe.

The Conservative Publication, Townhall.com, writes:

“Mary Cheney’s pregnancy poses problems not just for her child, but also for all Americans. Her action repudiates traditional values and sets an appalling example for young people at a time when father absence is the most pressing social problem facing the nation.”

At the Liberal Publication, Huffington Post rebuts:

“Dick and Lynn (Cheney) love their daughter. She’s an actual real person to them. They will stand by her, as they should, and the hell with ideology.

Well, the question by many is whether this “joyous occasion” should become a political question. What is a far more important question is whether or not it should become a moral and religious question? The answer that I give is a resounding yes. To not look at it in a religious light, if you profess religion, is foolish at best. However, if you do not profess Christianity, then I probably have little to say. For I can’t say much of anything without the context of Christ, and I would imagine you are just the opposite. In which case, it would probably be a fairly futile discussion.

So where do I stand on the issue? Honestly, I’m torn on it. One of the most important things that a kid needs is love. And I will admit that there are surely homosexual couples that are better qualified and able to provide loving and supportive relationships with their children then some heterosexual relationships are able to provide. I’ve known some kind and loving homosexuals and some abusive heterosexuals that both had kids. Personally, I don’t think either one is the ideal situation by any means. In my opinion, however, the most important thing that can be provided to children is to teach them in the knowledge of Christ; that’s what it comes down to for me. And that is something that would surely be difficult to convey as to openly live in a homosexual relationship is to openly live in sin. If you don’t agree about homosexuality as a sin, check out these other posts of mine about homosexuality in general and Gays in the Church. I won’t beat a dead horse and talk about that aspect in this blog further.

Now, if I was to stop there, that might not sound different than that presented by the “typical” Christian conservative. However, I don’t think you can stop there. You have to address sin. So first what is sin? GotQuestion.org has a good answer here But in a nutshell, courtesy of the website, sin is “transgression of the law of God (1 John 3:4) and rebellion against God (Deuteronomy 9:7; Joshua 1:18).” Surely a child that grows up in a homosexual will have a greater chance to grow up partaking in that sin. However, a child that grows up in a house of violence will be more likely to be violent to his family. A child that grows up in a house where the parents repeatedly commit adultery with others will be more likely to himself. Children really are sponges and truly do “absorb” the family environment around them. Will an adopted child of a gay family be more likely to be gay? Well, that is something that is still debated. But one can’t deny that they will probably be much more open and accepting and loving of that lifestyle: a lifestyle of sin. And to a large extent, a sin is a sin. See what GotQuestions has to say about that:

So, although Jesus said that lust and adultery are both sins – that does not mean they are equal. It is much worse to actually murder a person than it is to simply hate them – even though they are both sinful in God’s sight. There are degrees to sin. Some sins are worse than others. At the same time, in regards to both eternal consequences and salvation, all sins are the same. Each and every sin will lead to eternal condemnation (Romans 6:23). All sin, no matter how “small,” is against an infinite and eternal God, and is therefore worthy of an infinite and eternal penalty. Further, this is no sin too “big” that God cannot forgive it. Jesus died to pay the penalty for sin (1 John 2:2). Jesus died for ALL of our sins (2 Corinthians 5:21). Are all sins equal to God? Yes and no. In severity? Yes. In forgivability? Yes.

So where does that leave me? Well, it leaves me where I started: torn. Clearly, the best situation for a child would be to grow up with a Godly and loving Mother and Father. And one can’t really dispute that. Men and Women have different strengths, different things they can bring to the table in raising children. And these differences cannot be fully duplicated, even in a loving homosexual home. But if one just stated that people openly living in sin couldn’t adopt to protect the child, well, unfortunately there would be a lot of orphans because a lot of this country could not adopt.

And as much as I might wish it were so, there are not enough blameless couples going around to be able to adopt all the children that need parents, if any. So I will concede that in some cases, homosexual parents may be the best choice among other alternatives for an adopted child to have. I think it is a decision that needs to really be made on a case-by-case basis. A child would probably be better off in a loving homosexual home than on the streets. But that situation is not the ideal choice. And it is not the choice that God intended would have to be made. I saw a flyer once that “God made Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve.” There is some truth to that. God made man for woman and woman for man. While good things can come from bad people and love can come from homosexual parents, ultimately, the relationship is still a perversion of true marriage.

As Father Jonathan of FoxNews said in this good article:

What we do know is that two lesbian women can’t make babies, and as good as both women may be as caretakers, neither of them can be Dad. We also know there is a dad out there and this child will be deprived of his presence…

This story, however, of Mary Cheney and her partner, allows us the rare opportunity to examine the consequences of redefining the family to include homosexual couples, without getting bogged down with arguments about the moral status of homosexual behavior…

Many single mothers make great moms, but the ones I know are the first to say that nature (God) got it right with the complementary nature of the sexes, for both human reproduction and parenthood.

Trading a father or a mother for a third party lover may seem to make sense for the couple, but it will never make sense for the child.

But what is done is done. We now should celebrate the marvel of new life, a beautiful gift in every circumstance. I can understand why they are “ecstatic.”

I wish Mary, Heather and Mary’s child the very best.

Leave a comment if you feel so inspired, and let me know what you think.
————————-
Update. When I wrote this original blog, I didn’t know what it would start. But this blog has now been viewed over 300 times, and the three blogs that I have written about homosexuality, this one and the other two I link to, have been viewed in total nearly 500 times. Ironically, the one that I think is probably the best, Gays in the Church, has been viewed the least amount of times!

So what does that tell me? Clearly, there are a lot of hurt people in the world that are really searching. I think that’s great that people are searching because it means that we at least still care. Sometimes I almost think we have grown so apathetic it doesn’t matter. But whether you agree with me or disagree, at least, by and large, you have viewpoints and many are passionate about that. Viewpoints need to be discussed. Be it in the comments here or elsewhere. When things aren’t talked about, things definitely don’t get better. When not talked about, suspicions grow, stereotypes reign, and progress don’t happen. At the very least, communication, if don’t honestly and in a real manner, at least will help us to understand why other people think what they do. There are some things, like sin in the Church, abortion, and other things that I am truly passionate about. But it wasn’t until I stopped talking my viewpoints and starting listening to others that I began to at least understand why someone believed something. God gave us two ears and one mouth, so we need to do twice as much listening as talking. Do I agree with those people now? By no means, but at least I understand and can relate and talk with them more now. And I pray that can be the start of something. God bless.

~ by unclewormwood on December 9, 2006.

11 Responses to “Should Homosexuals be allowed to Adopt?”

  1. I would have to agree that I am torn on this subject as well. As far as adoption goes, God wants us to take care of the orphans. Don’t know how this applies to artificial insemination issues.

    I also think that we can no longer minister to a homosexual person by trying to “let them off the hook” saying homosexuality is just like any other sin. That used to be ok in the past when it was looked at as a choice. But now, the PC view of homosexuality is not about making a wrong choice but about accepting who you were created to be. And “discovering” your homosexuality. A homosexual person needs Jesus just like the heterosexual person–because we all have a built-in propensity for sin that completely separates us from God.

    I may be so far off base on this but from my limited knowledge comes a limited opinion. What would Jesus do? The bible gives plenty of examples of how he treated thieves, adulterers, prostitutes, the prideful and smug. But I don’t recall reading about a personal interaction with a homosexual. I guess the best thing to do is to follow the love God, love others command. Meet their needs, plant a seed of faith in Jesus if given the opportunity and let the Holy Spirit do its work.

  2. I agree Joni. It is a sticky subject. Read my latest post, as I talk about the issue some, and I’m interested to hear your thoughts.

  3. i could only read up to the quote below, to be honest, much of what i did read made a knot in my stomach, it’s hard to see some of your views… but i highly respect you for at least having strong views and standing by them, even if i do not necessarily agree with them.. anyway..

    “Surely a child that grows up in a homosexual will have a greater chance to grow up partaking in that sin”

    if you look into this subject you will actually find that many studies have looked into this, and having homosexual parents plays absolutely no role in the likely hood that the child will be homosexual, it’s not a choice(except int he case of the teens referring to themselves as “bi” just to attract attention), anyway, i don’t want to go into depth really, i wouldn’t want to taint your blog with my views, but, did you know..that when a woman gives birth to boys..each boy she has has a higher chance of being gay…simply due to the female hormones trying to reject the male hormones in her as the baby grows. it’s a nature versus nurture issue…and nurture doesn’t play into it. i was born heterosexual just as the next person is born homosexual.

  4. I appreciate your response and your opinion, but I do disagree with it. I never even intended to address the nature vs. nurture issue, but I do see how I indirectly brought that up. I’m not sure where you are getting your data, but I minored in psychology and have researched it and, frankly, the best minds in the world are torn on it. The most respected studies and works I am familiar with believe it to be a combination of the two, and I agree. But to say that nurture plays no role into the decision seems a pretty outlandish statement. Children exhibit learned behavior in every facet of their lives. That’s why women often marry a man like their father and boys their mother. That’s why a parents’ marriage results are often duplicated in their childrens’ lives. If someone grows up in a household where they are taught that homosexuality is a sin, among many other things, they will be less likely to think it an acceptable lifestyle than children with parents as practicing homosexuals.

    You actually stopped reading the blog though before I did switch back over and play devil’s advocate to some of those views though. Remember, I said I’m torn on the issue. Many people in the fundamental evangelical community would be adamantly opposed. And I do consider myself in that religious community as a born again Christian.

    I’d love to hear what you have to say more, so I hope to have you visit the website again. God bless.

  5. no i dont think so
    although some would make excellent parent, no doubts on that
    but i have done a school debate project on homosexuals and studies show that homosexuals are more likey to abuse children
    of course this doesnt apply to all homosexuals but i dont think that the government should take the risk

  6. very interesting Nancy. I think I had heard mention of those studies before, but I had forgotten them. Remember where you got that information for your debate project? I’d like to read that study.

    I definitely agree though that some homosexuals would make great parents, and I personally know many heterosexual parents that are pretty lousy. That’s what makes the argument so hard, and inconceivable for some to argue. God bless.

  7. i am doing a report on “should homosexuals or single parents be allowed to adopt?” and this kind of helped me out a little bit but im still against it

  8. i am doing a project on “should homosexuals or single parents be allowed to adopt?” and this website helped me out a little but i am still against it GOD BLESS

  9. I found this online not too long ago:

    “American College of Pediatricians, Information About Pediatric
    Medicine, Position Statements: WHERE WE STAND
    Article: Homosexual Parenting: Is It Time For Change?

    [...]

    Parenting > Adoption > Re: Dangers of …

    Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
    Topic >>
    Re: Dangers of Same-Sex Couples Adopting Children (Part 1)
    by joshinkman@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jinks) Nov 10, 2004 at 07:32 AM

    Robin Harritt wrote in message
    news:…
    > n article e7c66fa1.0411071511.73ace640@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
    Jinks at
    > joshinkman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
    wrote on 7/11/04 11:11 pm:
    >
    > > http://www.zenit.org/english/visualizza.phtml?sid=61437
    > >
    > >
    > > PROVIDENCE, Rhode Island, NOV. 4, 2004 (Zenit.org).- Despite the
    large
    > > number of securely married people waiting to adopt children, same-sex
    > > couples are often regarded as desirable adoptive parents with equal
    > > qualifications.
    > >
    > > So says Dale O’Leary, a writer and researcher for the Catholic
    Medical
    > > Association.
    > >
    > > She shared with ZENIT how adoption agencies have disregarded evidence
    > > that persons with same-sex attractions are far more likely to suffer
    > > from psychological disorders than the general public, and how those
    > > risk factors can negatively affect children.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > Surely being adopted by a gay couple is far superior to being adopted
    > by, for instance, a couple of right wing fundamentalist religious
    > arseholes though, isn’t it?
    >
    >
    > There is far more evidence to support the notion that people who are
    > religiously obsessed are likely to suffer from psychosis, than there
    > is to support the notion that “persons with same-sex attractions” are.

    Here’s a bit to support the ‘notion’ that the homosexual parenting
    puts the children at risk. I’d be interested in reviewing your
    evidence, but you neglected to include the cites.
    ************************************

    Site: American College of Pediatricians, Information About Pediatric
    Medicine
    Category: Position Statements: WHERE WE STAND
    Article: Homosexual Parenting: Is It Time For Change?

    Are children reared by two individuals of the same gender as
    well adjusted as children reared in families with a mother and a
    father? Until recently the unequivocal answer to this question
    was “no.” Policymakers, social scientists, the media, and even
    physician organizations1, however, are now asserting that
    prohibitions on parenting by homosexual couples should be
    lifted. In making such far-reaching, generation-changing
    assertions, any responsible advocate would rely upon supporting
    evidence that is comprehensive and conclusive. Not only is this
    not the situation, but also there is sound evidence that
    children exposed to the homosexual lifestyle may be at increased
    risk for emotional, mental, and even physical harm.

    Research data

    Heterosexual parenting is the normative model upon which most
    comprehensive longitudinal research on childrearing has been
    based. Data on long-term outcomes for children placed in
    homosexual households are very limited and the available
    evidence reveals grave concerns. Those current studies that
    appear to indicate neutral to favorable results from homosexual
    parenting have critical flaws such as non-longitudinal design,
    inadequate sample size, biased sample selection, lack of proper
    controls, and failure to account for confounding variables.2,3,4
    Childrearing studies have consistently indicated that children
    are more likely to thrive emotionally, mentally, and physically
    in a home with two heterosexual parents versus a home with a
    single parent. 5,6,7,8,9 Therefore, the burden is on the
    proponents of homosexual parenting to prove that moving further
    away from the heterosexual parenting model is appropriate and
    safe for children.

    Risks of Homosexual Lifestyle to Children

    Violence among homosexual partners is two to three times more
    common than among married heterosexual couples. 10,11,12,13,14
    Homosexual partnerships are significantly more prone to
    dissolution than heterosexual marriages with the average
    homosexual relationship lasting only two to three years.
    15,16,17 Homosexual men and women are reported to be
    inordinately promiscuous involving serial sex partners, even
    within what are loosely-termed “committed relationships.”
    18,19,20,21,22 Individuals who practice a homosexual lifestyle
    are more likely than heterosexuals to experience mental
    illness,23,24,25 substance abuse,26 suicidal tendencies,27,28
    and shortened life spans.29 Although some would claim that these
    dysfunctions are a result of societal pressures in America, the
    same dysfunctions exist at inordinately high levels among
    homosexuals in cultures were the practice is more widely
    accepted.30 Children reared in homosexual households are more
    likely to experience sexual confusion, practice homosexual
    behavior, and engage in sexual experimentation. 31,32,33,34,35
    Adolescents and young adults who adopt the homosexual lifestyle,
    like their adult counterparts, are at increased risk of mental
    health problems, including major depression, anxiety disorder,
    conduct disorder, substance dependence, and especially suicidal
    ideation and suicide attempts.36

    Conclusion

    The research literature on childrearing by homosexual parents is
    limited. The environment in which children are reared is
    absolutely critical to their development. Given the current
    body of research, the American College of Pediatricians believes
    it is inappropriate, potentially hazardous to children, and
    dangerously irresponsible to change the age-old prohibition on
    homosexual parenting, whether by adoption, foster care, or by
    reproductive manipulation. This position is rooted in the best
    available science.”

    http://www.acpeds.org/?CONTEXT=art&cat=25&art=59&BISKIT=3084889799

    Hope this helps.

    -J. Kaiser

  10. Sorry for the above post..it copied and pasted way too much. also the site isn’t to the same page, it is to the primary source.

    -J. Kaiser

  11. Kaiser,

    Thanks for the information. I’ve read studies where scientists and psychologists argue both and both very passionately. I’ll admit that there aren’t a lot of studies to go on if you are using those to support your decisions, regardless of which camp you fall in. However, while I think it can be interesting to see what those studies show, I’ve learned in my life to not base any opinion on the latest study. It seems that more often than not, a newer study will suggest the opposite is true.

    So I focus on what the Bible said about the issue and how that applies to this issue. Even then, the issue is not as clear as I would like, but a homosexual adoption is, at the very least, not going to be the ideal adoption.

Leave a Reply